Tabaqat Al Kubra. Vol. 3 Pg. 269 H. 3714 [ Firefox ]

This is a specific request for a deep review of a single hadith or athar (narration) within a particular volume and page of a classical Islamic text. I will provide an analysis based on the standard methodology of Hadith criticism (‘ilm al-ḥadīth), biographical evaluation (‘ilm al-rijāl), and historical context.

Or, in many manuscripts of this volume regarding the Ansar, it details the specific individuals who pledged allegiance or the logistical hardships of the march. tabaqat al kubra. vol. 3 pg. 269 h. 3714

Historical Analysis: The Shortage of Mounts

The significance of this entry lies in its depiction of the resource disparity between the early Muslims and the Quraysh. The report usually cites the famous statistic regarding the "three men to a camel." This is a specific request for a deep

• Positive: Immense knowledge of maghazi (expeditions), historian of Madinah.
• Negative: Accused by the vast majority of muhaddithun (hadith critics) of being weak (da‘if), even abandoned (matruk) or liar (kadhdhab) regarding hadith.
• Critics: Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: “He is a liar.” Yahya ibn Ma‘in: “Not trustworthy.” Al-Bukhari and Abu Hatim: “Abandoned.” Al-Nasa’i: “The liars are four… al-Waqidi.”
• Consequence: Any narration with al-Waqidi in the chain is considered very weak (da‘if jiddan) or fabricated (mawdu‘) by Sunni hadith standards. Ibn Sa‘d himself (al-Waqidi’s student and secretary) narrates from him frequently in Tabaqat, but scholars note that Ibn Sa‘d used al-Waqidi for historical reports, not necessarily for legal or rigorous hadith.

Why would a leader of his stature admit to such a lingering trait? Perhaps because the greatest threat to spiritual growth is the lie that we are already "finished." By naming his remaining Why would a leader of his stature admit

References: